<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDD = ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rationalistic.com/2009/04/07/software/ddd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rationalistic.com/2009/04/07/software/ddd/</link>
	<description>Memes and other creatures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesl</title>
		<link>http://www.rationalistic.com/2009/04/07/software/ddd/comment-page-1/#comment-104133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rationalistic.com/?p=328#comment-104133</guid>
		<description>You may find this post interesting as a design technique / exercise to try, as it gets you to think differently: http://jamesladdcode.com/?p=12
Trying the &#039;East&#039; approach forces you to use the Hollywood Principle and the Law Of Demeter. I&#039;d also be interested in your experience with applying the approach as an exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may find this post interesting as a design technique / exercise to try, as it gets you to think differently: <a href="http://jamesladdcode.com/?p=12" rel="nofollow">http://jamesladdcode.com/?p=12</a><br />
Trying the &#8216;East&#8217; approach forces you to use the Hollywood Principle and the Law Of Demeter. I&#8217;d also be interested in your experience with applying the approach as an exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tal Rotbart</title>
		<link>http://www.rationalistic.com/2009/04/07/software/ddd/comment-page-1/#comment-104078</link>
		<dc:creator>Tal Rotbart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rationalistic.com/?p=328#comment-104078</guid>
		<description>Nick is a great bloke and an incredible developer -- I&#039;ve worked with him at White Pages @ Sensis. I&#039;ll definitely have a read of his blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick is a great bloke and an incredible developer &#8212; I&#8217;ve worked with him at White Pages @ Sensis. I&#8217;ll definitely have a read of his blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.rationalistic.com/2009/04/07/software/ddd/comment-page-1/#comment-104066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rationalistic.com/?p=328#comment-104066</guid>
		<description>Good point - I think one of if not the most important parts of OOP is the law of demeter. So many times we just use &#039;objects&#039; as data containers and completely miss the chance to create nice abstractions with behaviour.

My colleague Nick Drew has written a cool post on refactoring code to Tell Don&#039;t Ask - http://pilchardfriendly.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/refactoring-to-law-of-demeter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point &#8211; I think one of if not the most important parts of OOP is the law of demeter. So many times we just use &#8216;objects&#8217; as data containers and completely miss the chance to create nice abstractions with behaviour.</p>
<p>My colleague Nick Drew has written a cool post on refactoring code to Tell Don&#8217;t Ask &#8211; <a href="http://pilchardfriendly.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/refactoring-to-law-of-demeter/" rel="nofollow">http://pilchardfriendly.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/refactoring-to-law-of-demeter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

